Map by Reddit user flyingcatwithhorns
The contrast is striking. Europe’s passenger rail network forms an intricate web connecting cities large and small across the continent.
From London to Istanbul, from Stockholm to Seville, you can hop on a train and reach virtually any major destination.
Meanwhile, the American map shows scattered lines that barely connect major metropolitan areas, leaving vast regions completely isolated from passenger rail service.
What Europe Got Right
European countries invested heavily in rail infrastructure throughout the 20th century, treating trains as essential public transportation rather than just freight carriers.
High-speed rail networks like France’s TGV and Spain’s AVE transformed how people think about intercity travel. A trip from Paris to Lyon takes just two hours by train, making it faster and more convenient than flying when you factor in airport security and travel time.
The European approach prioritizes connectivity. Regional trains feed into national networks, which connect to international routes. This integration means a commuter in a small German town can seamlessly travel to Rome or Barcelona using the same rail system.
Where America Went Wrong
The United States made a crucial decision in the 1950s to prioritize highways and aviation over passenger rail.
The Interstate Highway System and cheap domestic flights seemed like the future. Passenger rail was largely abandoned to freight companies, who had little interest in maintaining infrastructure suitable for people.
Outside the Northeast Corridor, American passenger rail exists more as a romantic notion than practical transportation. Amtrak’s cross-country routes take days to complete journeys that would take hours by plane or car.
The lack of investment has created a vicious cycle where poor service leads to low ridership, which justifies continued underinvestment.
The Climate Reality Check
This transportation divide has environmental consequences.
European travelers can choose low-carbon rail options for most intercity trips. Americans faced with a 400-mile journey between cities have essentially one choice: drive or fly, both carbon-intensive options.
Rail transportation produces roughly one-tenth the carbon emissions per passenger mile compared to flying and significantly less than driving alone. Europe’s extensive rail network gives travelers climate-friendly options that simply don’t exist across most of America.
Looking Forward
Some American regions are finally recognizing what Europe figured out decades ago. California’s high-speed rail project, despite delays and cost overruns, represents an attempt to join the modern world of passenger rail. Proposed corridors in Texas, the Southeast, and Pacific Northwest suggest growing recognition that trains aren’t just nostalgic relics.
The map tells a story about choices. Europe chose connectivity and sustainability. America chose cars and planes. The question now is whether it’s too late for America to choose differently.
Help us out by sharing this map: