Map by Reddit user CzarEDII
Remember staring at that world map in elementary school, marveling at how absolutely enormous Russia appeared compared to Africa? Turns out, your eyes weren’t playing tricks on you, but the map certainly was.
The Mercator projection, invented in 1569 by Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator, has been warping our perception of global geography for centuries.
Why Maps Lie (And Have To)
Here’s the fundamental problem: Earth is a sphere, but maps are flat. Imagine trying to peel an orange and lay the skin completely flat without any tears or overlaps. Impossible, right?
Cartographers face the same challenge when creating world maps. The Mercator projection solves this by stretching landmasses as they get farther from the equator.
The Shocking Truth About Size
This map reveals the stunning reality. That red line stretching across Africa measures 7,200 kilometers, while the line across Russia spans 6,400 kilometers.
Despite Russia appearing dramatically larger on traditional maps, Africa is actually about 800 kilometers wider at these points.
In total area, Africa covers roughly 30.3 million square kilometers compared to Russia’s 17.1 million square kilometers. Africa could fit the entire United States, China, India, and most of Europe inside its borders with room to spare.
Why This Matters More Than You Think
These distortions aren’t just geographical curiosities. They’ve shaped centuries of cultural perceptions and geopolitical thinking.
When Africa appears smaller than it actually is, we unconsciously diminish its importance and vastness. This visual bias has influenced everything from colonial attitudes to modern international relations and aid distribution decisions.
The Mercator projection was originally designed for maritime navigation, where preserving angles and directions mattered more than accurate size representation. Sailors needed straight-line navigation routes, not proportional landmass comparisons.
Beyond Russia and Africa
The distortion affects other regions dramatically, too. Greenland appears roughly the size of Africa on Mercator maps, when it’s actually about 14 times smaller.
Antarctica looks impossibly massive, stretching across the entire bottom of the map, when it’s actually smaller than South America.
Better Alternatives Exist
Modern cartographers have developed more accurate projections like the Gall-Peters projection, which preserves area relationships, or the Robinson projection, which balances various distortions. However, the Mercator projection remains dominant in classrooms and popular culture.
Next time you see a world map, remember that geography isn’t always as it appears. Our planet is far more fascinating and proportionally surprising than those classroom wall maps ever let on.
Help us out by sharing this map: